Epping Forest Residents
A NATIONALIST AND SURVIVORS PERSPECTIVE.
Sunday, 25 December 2011
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas to everyone and a very happy new year. This years Christmas dinner was an excellent event and enjoyed by all those who came and enjoyed the good food and great company.
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Saturday, 10 September 2011
Friday, 9 September 2011
Islamic Sharia Law Proliferates in Germany
The spread of Islamic Sharia law in Germany is far more advanced than previously thought, and German authorities are "powerless" to do anything about it, according to a new book about the Muslim shadow justice system in Germany.
The 236-page book titled "Judges Without Law: Islamic Parallel Justice Endangers Our Constitutional State," which was authored by Joachim Wagner, a German legal expert and former investigative journalist for ARD German public television, says Islamic Sharia courts are now operating in all of Germany's big cities.
This "parallel justice system" is undermining the rule of law in Germany, Wagner says, because Muslim arbiters-cum-imams are settling criminal cases out of court without the involvement of German prosecutors or lawyers before law enforcement can bring the cases to a German court.
See here for the full story.
The 236-page book titled "Judges Without Law: Islamic Parallel Justice Endangers Our Constitutional State," which was authored by Joachim Wagner, a German legal expert and former investigative journalist for ARD German public television, says Islamic Sharia courts are now operating in all of Germany's big cities.
This "parallel justice system" is undermining the rule of law in Germany, Wagner says, because Muslim arbiters-cum-imams are settling criminal cases out of court without the involvement of German prosecutors or lawyers before law enforcement can bring the cases to a German court.
See here for the full story.
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Islam overtakes Catholicism as the most practised religion in France
The true extent of France’s frightening level of Islamification was revealed this week with the news that there are more practising Muslims in France than practising Catholics and that mosques are being built at 50 times the rate of Roman Catholic churches.
The total number of mosques in France has doubled to more than 2,000 during the past ten years, according to the research report ‘Constructing Mosques: The Governance of Islam in France and the Netherlands’.
France’s most prominent Muslim leader, Dalil Boubakeur, rector of the Grand Mosque of Paris, recently called for the number of mosques in the country to be doubled again – to 4,000 – to meet ‘growing demand’.
Click here for more.
Sunday, 21 August 2011
Churchill
CHURCHILL ON ISLAM
Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899... (check - The River War).
The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late 19th and 20th centuries.
He was a brave young soldier, a journalist, a politician and statesman, a war leader and British Prime Minister. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral.
HERE IS THE SPEECH:
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome ."
Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).
Looks like Churchill saw it coming......
Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899... (check - The River War).
The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late 19th and 20th centuries.
He was a brave young soldier, a journalist, a politician and statesman, a war leader and British Prime Minister. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral.
HERE IS THE SPEECH:
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome ."
Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).
Looks like Churchill saw it coming......
Friday, 19 August 2011
Committed opinions?
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Centre (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.
“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame.”
As an example, the ongoing events in Tunisia and Egypt appear to exhibit a similar process, according to Szymanski. “In those countries, dictators who were in power for decades were suddenly overthrown in just a few weeks.”
The findings were published in the July 22, 2011, early online edition of the journal Physical Review E in an article titled “Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities.”
“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame.”
As an example, the ongoing events in Tunisia and Egypt appear to exhibit a similar process, according to Szymanski. “In those countries, dictators who were in power for decades were suddenly overthrown in just a few weeks.”
The findings were published in the July 22, 2011, early online edition of the journal Physical Review E in an article titled “Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities.”
Tuesday, 16 August 2011
The Change
Nationalism in this country is evolving.
The oppositions game of sticking together is faltering. Our Councillors have had snide whispers and sly comments in the council chambers. We have had a one party adversity to subjects our councillors have spoken against, whereby the whole council gang up together against them. They have been dismissed from meetings by chairman calling them racist. They have been condemned for not turning up at meetings, and yet out of the same mouths condemned for being present. For saying nothing and yet speaking. They will debate with any political backing and spokes person, but very rarely get the challenge to, having a no platform with the BNP tactic.
So why the fear towards us nationalists? Why the adversity towards us? Why no distinction between the so called mainstream parties, when engaging us in debate? Why no platform?
The reason is this.
Our politics is unrivalled in its distinction, it’s the oldest politics there is, and every creed has it. Its one of self preservation for ones own culture, and other cultures. It’s a political phenomenon, its rising up in every European and eastern block country. It’s a politics that all other parties want to be, and like to think they are, but are quite simply not.
It’s a way of life, a religion, and a state of mind, a level of ones own morals and consciousness.
This is what the mainstream fear
While the political smaller groups feeling important, paddle side by side with the bigger parties, and are welcomed with open arms before the knife of control slowly turns, the one gang liberal element of the big boys, slowly injects its poison of apathy to its people, you and me.
Fear of loosing an argument against a nationalist voice, bonds the relations between these groups.
Fight the racist, fight the Nazis, join together in harmony, its nice not to hate.
We are, only the first wave of our kind, we are the infants of the future generation of politicians, and we learn with every experience we are put through by our enemies, and will pass it on. The youth are our future, and their time is soon coming. Its not long off now.
Nationalism will no longer take the cloak of any particular movement now the voter has seen the UK riots.
It will be based on the integrity of the individual person, and will soon become self evident to the left of the sentiment of each representative elected. This will not, nor cannot be monitored nor will it be apparent, as the attitude will evolve due to questions of freedom for our own peoples future. Therefore the left by defeating the BNP in elections, and causing divides, has now unleashed a carriage for a voice to travel to the people. The difference is it is without the bile and hatred that was slandered against any right wing argument before, carrying the same flag and banner. Nationalist attitudes of people have now become a subsurface movement which will slowly take control of boroughs up and down the country, without the carrier even realising it.
The elected will not want a riot in their back yard, because now they know its possible.
Indeed, our opponents really do not realise the effects the recent riots have had on this country, and unfortunately a precedent has been set, and will never be the same again.
David Starkey, would never have seen himself a few months ago, speak out recently like he did. Examples like this will push people to question the slander this gentleman has experienced as the vile media squirm at the truth in what he said.
People will slowly, no longer tread on egg shells in political arguments, and slowly the racist chant will fall on deaf ears, a meaningless Marxist invented over used word branded on anyone who disagrees with 'their' main stream thinking. Quite simply the unfortunate victim wont care if it is used against them.
The destruction the riots have shown, has now injected an excitement of rebellion based on black lawlessness the media has portrayed into the youth. Black idols and music escalated by the media and turned into god status, is now the youths rallying cry and church with chants of ‘respect‘ being its anthem. It has unfairly victimised both Black and White youths alike. And it is the media, together with the politicians that are now taking a big side step.
With it, it has now brought many people, furious by the rioters actions, to sit up and question the reality of what they have seen. It is now, not hard to be able to predict more of the same, becoming a common sight on the TV screen. Indeed, things will never now be the same as before the riots.
For an example see here.
The oppositions game of sticking together is faltering. Our Councillors have had snide whispers and sly comments in the council chambers. We have had a one party adversity to subjects our councillors have spoken against, whereby the whole council gang up together against them. They have been dismissed from meetings by chairman calling them racist. They have been condemned for not turning up at meetings, and yet out of the same mouths condemned for being present. For saying nothing and yet speaking. They will debate with any political backing and spokes person, but very rarely get the challenge to, having a no platform with the BNP tactic.
So why the fear towards us nationalists? Why the adversity towards us? Why no distinction between the so called mainstream parties, when engaging us in debate? Why no platform?
The reason is this.
Our politics is unrivalled in its distinction, it’s the oldest politics there is, and every creed has it. Its one of self preservation for ones own culture, and other cultures. It’s a political phenomenon, its rising up in every European and eastern block country. It’s a politics that all other parties want to be, and like to think they are, but are quite simply not.
It’s a way of life, a religion, and a state of mind, a level of ones own morals and consciousness.
This is what the mainstream fear
While the political smaller groups feeling important, paddle side by side with the bigger parties, and are welcomed with open arms before the knife of control slowly turns, the one gang liberal element of the big boys, slowly injects its poison of apathy to its people, you and me.
Fear of loosing an argument against a nationalist voice, bonds the relations between these groups.
Fight the racist, fight the Nazis, join together in harmony, its nice not to hate.
We are, only the first wave of our kind, we are the infants of the future generation of politicians, and we learn with every experience we are put through by our enemies, and will pass it on. The youth are our future, and their time is soon coming. Its not long off now.
Nationalism will no longer take the cloak of any particular movement now the voter has seen the UK riots.
It will be based on the integrity of the individual person, and will soon become self evident to the left of the sentiment of each representative elected. This will not, nor cannot be monitored nor will it be apparent, as the attitude will evolve due to questions of freedom for our own peoples future. Therefore the left by defeating the BNP in elections, and causing divides, has now unleashed a carriage for a voice to travel to the people. The difference is it is without the bile and hatred that was slandered against any right wing argument before, carrying the same flag and banner. Nationalist attitudes of people have now become a subsurface movement which will slowly take control of boroughs up and down the country, without the carrier even realising it.
The elected will not want a riot in their back yard, because now they know its possible.
Indeed, our opponents really do not realise the effects the recent riots have had on this country, and unfortunately a precedent has been set, and will never be the same again.
David Starkey, would never have seen himself a few months ago, speak out recently like he did. Examples like this will push people to question the slander this gentleman has experienced as the vile media squirm at the truth in what he said.
People will slowly, no longer tread on egg shells in political arguments, and slowly the racist chant will fall on deaf ears, a meaningless Marxist invented over used word branded on anyone who disagrees with 'their' main stream thinking. Quite simply the unfortunate victim wont care if it is used against them.
The destruction the riots have shown, has now injected an excitement of rebellion based on black lawlessness the media has portrayed into the youth. Black idols and music escalated by the media and turned into god status, is now the youths rallying cry and church with chants of ‘respect‘ being its anthem. It has unfairly victimised both Black and White youths alike. And it is the media, together with the politicians that are now taking a big side step.
With it, it has now brought many people, furious by the rioters actions, to sit up and question the reality of what they have seen. It is now, not hard to be able to predict more of the same, becoming a common sight on the TV screen. Indeed, things will never now be the same as before the riots.
For an example see here.
Sunday, 14 August 2011
England riots: 'The whites have become black' says David Starkey
Click on the text for the BBC footage.
Historian David Starkey has told BBC's Newsnight ''the whites have become black'' in a discussion on the England riots with author and broadcaster Dreda Say Mitchell and the author of Chavs, Owen Jones.
He also hit out at what he called the ''destructive, nihilistic gangster culture'' which he said ''has become the fashion.''
Historian David Starkey has told BBC's Newsnight ''the whites have become black'' in a discussion on the England riots with author and broadcaster Dreda Say Mitchell and the author of Chavs, Owen Jones.
He also hit out at what he called the ''destructive, nihilistic gangster culture'' which he said ''has become the fashion.''
Saturday, 13 August 2011
View from a resident
"Sooner or later everyone sits down to a banquet of consequences"
Robert Lois Stevenson.
To all those of a Liberal mindset, and all who believe that cultural and ethnic differences are irrelevant, to those who believe that the multi-racial society has a long term future, to those in other words, who believe we will all live happily ever after, I ask this question....
WHAT IF YOU ARE WRONG?
What happens if, as I believe it has, the world enters into a period of crisis? A period that has the potential to be one of most violent and economically destructive in world history. "A wild assertion" I hear you cry! Maybe, maybe not. There's plenty of evidence to back it. But we shall put that aside for now, this after all is only a thought experiment.
What, one has to ask, is what will happen when you take away a peoples current wealth and future prospects? Prospects that will become extremely limited anyway.
What happens if, it is only money and material well being that is keeping the multi-racial charade together?
What happens if, in the great evolutionary scheme of things, it is the individual who is irrelevant and only the group that counts?
What happens if, in times of crisis it is to their own group that people turn for strength and security. Thereby rapidly re-enforcing group identity and their own self-interest?
And finally, what if Enoch Powell was right and you Liberals were wrong!
"There where the danger is deliverance also grows" Holderin.
Robert Lois Stevenson.
To all those of a Liberal mindset, and all who believe that cultural and ethnic differences are irrelevant, to those who believe that the multi-racial society has a long term future, to those in other words, who believe we will all live happily ever after, I ask this question....
WHAT IF YOU ARE WRONG?
What happens if, as I believe it has, the world enters into a period of crisis? A period that has the potential to be one of most violent and economically destructive in world history. "A wild assertion" I hear you cry! Maybe, maybe not. There's plenty of evidence to back it. But we shall put that aside for now, this after all is only a thought experiment.
What, one has to ask, is what will happen when you take away a peoples current wealth and future prospects? Prospects that will become extremely limited anyway.
What happens if, it is only money and material well being that is keeping the multi-racial charade together?
What happens if, in the great evolutionary scheme of things, it is the individual who is irrelevant and only the group that counts?
What happens if, in times of crisis it is to their own group that people turn for strength and security. Thereby rapidly re-enforcing group identity and their own self-interest?
And finally, what if Enoch Powell was right and you Liberals were wrong!
"There where the danger is deliverance also grows" Holderin.
Friday, 12 August 2011
Sunday, 7 August 2011
Fires started after Tottenham police shooting protest
Petrol bombs have been thrown at police and a shop, two patrol cars and a bus set on fire in a disturbance in Tottenham, north London. See here for more.
Thursday, 28 July 2011
Doors open!

Epping Forest Residents Blog has kept silent for the past few months mainly due to the build up of the leadership challenge within the BNP. Now that the leadership challenge is over we can now get on with the seriousness of the local politics which unfortunately, is as predicted by us, changing fairly fast before our very eyes.
So lets get started and open our doors again with some local, not to distant news items.
This was an article in the Daily Star on the 20th – the story has now been censored and pulled.
HARDCORE Islamists have vowed to ban booze and mixing between the sexes in new Sharia law enforcement zones across the UK.
The move will see specific areas flooded with thousands of stickers saying “no gambling”, “no music or concerts”, “no porn or prostitution” and “no drugs or smoking”.
The posters declare: “You are entering a Sharia controlled zone – Islamic rules enforced.”
The radicals will kick off their controlled zones in the London borough of Waltham Forest later this month.
They also claim their hardline rules will be policed by thousands of “Sharia cops” on the streets.
See here
and here for more.
Saturday, 28 May 2011
Unbelievable
Just when you think you have heard it all something crops up that highlights the fact that its a crazy world we live in.
A couple in Toronto have decided to prevent the world from knowing the sexual gender of their child (click here)
I am dumbfounded at this decision and whilst it is hard sometimes to agree with certain forms of parenting and styles of education this surely is going to far?
A child in this day and age has enough struggles and outside influences to deal with, a comparable early exposure to the big wide world compared to just a few generations ago brought on in the main by television and the internet but to deny a child guidance and the ability to form its own identity at an early age is in my opinion criminal.
If you want to be a liberal minded parent you could openly discuss all aspects of sexual and gender preference as and when the questions and issue arise but to deny a child the security and knowledge of who they are at an early age can only surely be an indicator of possible mental health issue of its parents?
What benefit could be gained for this infant from not being informed of its gender?
Children are by nature asexual in outlook compared to that of an adults perception of sexuality but are aware at an early age of the differences between the gender of their siblings and peers. This regardless of politics and political correctness really does boil down to nature and instinct. There are exceptions to the rule as in most things but in the main this is fact. Who on earth should be the judge of a child and being able to restrict their
recognition of sexuality?
I bet Freud and Jung would have a field day at this one!
A permissive society is one thing but I feel this pushes the parameters to far. If a child in your care has a gender identity issue then recognising it and supporting it is one thing that you can do to help but almost creating the conditions is madness I fear.
A couple in Toronto have decided to prevent the world from knowing the sexual gender of their child (click here)
I am dumbfounded at this decision and whilst it is hard sometimes to agree with certain forms of parenting and styles of education this surely is going to far?
A child in this day and age has enough struggles and outside influences to deal with, a comparable early exposure to the big wide world compared to just a few generations ago brought on in the main by television and the internet but to deny a child guidance and the ability to form its own identity at an early age is in my opinion criminal.
If you want to be a liberal minded parent you could openly discuss all aspects of sexual and gender preference as and when the questions and issue arise but to deny a child the security and knowledge of who they are at an early age can only surely be an indicator of possible mental health issue of its parents?
What benefit could be gained for this infant from not being informed of its gender?
Children are by nature asexual in outlook compared to that of an adults perception of sexuality but are aware at an early age of the differences between the gender of their siblings and peers. This regardless of politics and political correctness really does boil down to nature and instinct. There are exceptions to the rule as in most things but in the main this is fact. Who on earth should be the judge of a child and being able to restrict their
recognition of sexuality?
I bet Freud and Jung would have a field day at this one!
A permissive society is one thing but I feel this pushes the parameters to far. If a child in your care has a gender identity issue then recognising it and supporting it is one thing that you can do to help but almost creating the conditions is madness I fear.
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
No 2 AV
Just in case you are unsure which way to vote this week regarding the AV referendum we at Epping Forest Residents are opposed to the Alternative Vote system.
Even though the strange portrayal by many that this type of electoral system will enhance the chances of parties such as the BNP we are not advocating this system.
Many MPs have said that this type of system will enable the BNP to gain seats however it seems that they just use the opportunity to have a cheap snipe and get the word extremist into their statement. Any one who doesn't agree with them seems to be labelled an extremist. (see how it works here)
So the message is clear from us
VOTE NO TO AV .............. it is the Liberals that want it!
Even though the strange portrayal by many that this type of electoral system will enhance the chances of parties such as the BNP we are not advocating this system.
Many MPs have said that this type of system will enable the BNP to gain seats however it seems that they just use the opportunity to have a cheap snipe and get the word extremist into their statement. Any one who doesn't agree with them seems to be labelled an extremist. (see how it works here)
So the message is clear from us
VOTE NO TO AV .............. it is the Liberals that want it!
Monday, 2 May 2011
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Saturday, 30 April 2011
The Royal wedding
There seems to be a distinct lack of comments or articles within the nationalist community regarding the massive event yesterday that happened yesterday. The Royal wedding. Whatever your feelings towards the royals you can only be impressed at the service that was held in Westminster abbey a building used for Royal events for a thousand years and is home to the tomb of King Edward and the unknown soldier .
The pageantry that was laid on with our armed forces on full display in a way that only Britain can manage, a way that caught the attention of many people around the world. The crowds were all celebrating peacefully with only a few arrests, surely the whole event was something that every Brit should be proud of?
I for one was.
The service sent out a clear message, one that must have set the PC brigade and all the minority group campaigners back years in their work. The message was centred on the sanctity and importance of marriage between a man and a woman. A real good family value lesson. One that is missing in society as a whole today. The message also sent out reaffirmation of the fact that we are a Christian nation and we unite under one religion.
What was also clear and noticeable was the absence of those that have damaged our nation in the past ten years. Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and their partners were not invited! and Margaret Hodges constituency that was so important to Labour last year was noted as the only constituency that did not have a celebration whatsoever. It would seem that Labours Britain obviously is a vision that doesn't impress the Royals.
The icing on the cake was the final hymn. A hymn that is dear to every nationalist minded person belted out in the most important celebration of the year. Jerusalem, the nationalist anthem.
We wish the young couple well.
The pageantry that was laid on with our armed forces on full display in a way that only Britain can manage, a way that caught the attention of many people around the world. The crowds were all celebrating peacefully with only a few arrests, surely the whole event was something that every Brit should be proud of?
I for one was.
The service sent out a clear message, one that must have set the PC brigade and all the minority group campaigners back years in their work. The message was centred on the sanctity and importance of marriage between a man and a woman. A real good family value lesson. One that is missing in society as a whole today. The message also sent out reaffirmation of the fact that we are a Christian nation and we unite under one religion.
What was also clear and noticeable was the absence of those that have damaged our nation in the past ten years. Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and their partners were not invited! and Margaret Hodges constituency that was so important to Labour last year was noted as the only constituency that did not have a celebration whatsoever. It would seem that Labours Britain obviously is a vision that doesn't impress the Royals.
The icing on the cake was the final hymn. A hymn that is dear to every nationalist minded person belted out in the most important celebration of the year. Jerusalem, the nationalist anthem.
We wish the young couple well.
Sunday, 24 April 2011
Saturday, 23 April 2011
Happy St Georges day
St George is a legendary man, known, respected and celebrated throughout many countries and cultures from as far as Russia to Egypt. He is the patron saint of England not because of his nationality and not for his parentage as he came from humble people but for his bravery and his perseverance, his loyalty to his upbringing and identity as a Christian.
Born in approximately 280 AD (+/- as the dates are not exact) in Syria,Palaestinia according to some and to others in Cappadocia (Turkey) to Christian parents. After the death of his parents he joined the Roman army that was pagan in its beliefs. He rapidly rose to fame for his skills as an excellent and fearsome soldier.
The Pagan Roman Emperor Diocletian ordered the persecution of Christians, something that George refused to obey, he protested to the Emperor to no avail. The Emperor ordered the torture of George to break him of his faith. George faced terrible tortures but never gave in. He was beheaded for who he was and what he believed in on the 23rd April 303 AD
His body was taken to Lydda in Palestine for burial.Now known as Lod, Israel
Alfred the Great first made mention to St George and his feast. By 1190 English ships adorned the white flag with the red cross. Many English kings used the flag on their armour and shields so as to be identified in battle.The crusades also spread the fame of St George across Europe.
St George is indeed a worthy man to have as our patron saint. His courage and conviction has stood the test of time and spanned the centuries,earned him respect in many cultures and even religions. Even in early Islamic literature as a saintly figure with a slightly differing story but with the same sense of conviction and martyrdom.
Whatever you religious persuasion or nationality or identity you can only but admire such a man for his true strength of conviction and belief.
Happy St Georges day to everyone, to all those celebrating this day around England ( and I know there are many such group events) enjoy yourselves and reflect on the life and achievements of this great man.
Friday, 22 April 2011
Epping Forest College
Many times over the years we have raised issues and highlighted problems that Epping Forest College has brought to Loughton and Debden but there is an impending problem that many local parents are beginning to realise and have contacted us directly over.
Children are now being required to stay on at school until they are 18 years old. This is gradually being introduced and some children in the younger years of senior school will now have to stay on in education for two years longer than those in their final years of school now.
The issues about this decision are complex and many say that they are just a way of reducing the youth unemployment figures, personally I do not think that two extra years learning is a bad thing at all, providing that those two years which are probably the most impressionable two years of a young adults life are filled with genuine productive information and assistance.
What options do we have around Loughton and Debden? Davenant provides a limited six form and so does West hatch. Both good schools and those that get to attend are relatively lucky I would assume. Many of our youth will not have the chance and will have to choose from Harlow college with all the logistical issues and Epping Forest College.
The college has received a facelift and new facilities in recent years and on paper it should be a good place for our local youth to attend. Many hold deep concerns however that the college is biased towards students from out of the area and after much research I have to uphold those opinions.
Reading the most recent Ofsted report (not the damming one but the later one) that talks about how the college has now moved after much work to a "satisfactory" rating, not good or excellent but satisfactory I am dumbfounded to see the lack of consideration, provisions and opportunities available to the youth of Debden and Loughton.
Quite clearly the college prides itself on its massive intake of ethnic heritage students, a third of its total intake they claim. I am dubious of this figure and view it as conservative to say the least but even so that would total approximately 1200 plus per annum.
It prides itself on almost half its annual intake being from deprived areas. According to their figures that makes approximately 1825. Now either it classes Loughton and Debden as deprived or many of the non ethnic heritage background students are also from outside the area.
The concerning problem in all these reports is that in all the areas considered for equality, diversity making sure you don't offend and are inclusive to everyone nowhere does it mention an impact on the local environment or residents.
Let alone crime rates but we never expect a real assessment for that do we?
So the council are happy that they fulfil their ethnic enhancement needs, they have even made sure that the network of black professionals are involved as can be seen here (if you read section 8.1) Can you imagine the uproar if their was a network for white processionals it would be racist and I am damn sure the college or council would not allow such an organisation to be trained there.
The point to this article is a basic one. We need more spaces for local children to stay on in education. Some local schools have already announced that they will not provide the spaces so you need to seek alternatives.
Either fund the schools to provide the spaces. Use the money that goes to political correctness schemes and enhancement programs to fund it. Or even redirect funds from the Gypsy and traveller schemes and the suchlike.
or
Stop importing students from other areas and make way for our youth. Let their councils find the budgets.
The message is clear. Local schools for local children.
The Ofsted report fails to clarify the qualifying categories for ethnic heritage background. Well the majority of our children have an ethnic heritage background: ENGLISH.
As an ethnic heritage group we are being pushed aside in favour of others. Other heritage groups are being given advantages over and above the English.
This is quite simply racist.
Children are now being required to stay on at school until they are 18 years old. This is gradually being introduced and some children in the younger years of senior school will now have to stay on in education for two years longer than those in their final years of school now.
The issues about this decision are complex and many say that they are just a way of reducing the youth unemployment figures, personally I do not think that two extra years learning is a bad thing at all, providing that those two years which are probably the most impressionable two years of a young adults life are filled with genuine productive information and assistance.
What options do we have around Loughton and Debden? Davenant provides a limited six form and so does West hatch. Both good schools and those that get to attend are relatively lucky I would assume. Many of our youth will not have the chance and will have to choose from Harlow college with all the logistical issues and Epping Forest College.
The college has received a facelift and new facilities in recent years and on paper it should be a good place for our local youth to attend. Many hold deep concerns however that the college is biased towards students from out of the area and after much research I have to uphold those opinions.
Reading the most recent Ofsted report (not the damming one but the later one) that talks about how the college has now moved after much work to a "satisfactory" rating, not good or excellent but satisfactory I am dumbfounded to see the lack of consideration, provisions and opportunities available to the youth of Debden and Loughton.
Quite clearly the college prides itself on its massive intake of ethnic heritage students, a third of its total intake they claim. I am dubious of this figure and view it as conservative to say the least but even so that would total approximately 1200 plus per annum.
It prides itself on almost half its annual intake being from deprived areas. According to their figures that makes approximately 1825. Now either it classes Loughton and Debden as deprived or many of the non ethnic heritage background students are also from outside the area.
The concerning problem in all these reports is that in all the areas considered for equality, diversity making sure you don't offend and are inclusive to everyone nowhere does it mention an impact on the local environment or residents.
Let alone crime rates but we never expect a real assessment for that do we?
So the council are happy that they fulfil their ethnic enhancement needs, they have even made sure that the network of black professionals are involved as can be seen here (if you read section 8.1) Can you imagine the uproar if their was a network for white processionals it would be racist and I am damn sure the college or council would not allow such an organisation to be trained there.
The point to this article is a basic one. We need more spaces for local children to stay on in education. Some local schools have already announced that they will not provide the spaces so you need to seek alternatives.
Either fund the schools to provide the spaces. Use the money that goes to political correctness schemes and enhancement programs to fund it. Or even redirect funds from the Gypsy and traveller schemes and the suchlike.
or
Stop importing students from other areas and make way for our youth. Let their councils find the budgets.
The message is clear. Local schools for local children.
The Ofsted report fails to clarify the qualifying categories for ethnic heritage background. Well the majority of our children have an ethnic heritage background: ENGLISH.
As an ethnic heritage group we are being pushed aside in favour of others. Other heritage groups are being given advantages over and above the English.
This is quite simply racist.
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
AV?
Regarding the referendum on Alternative Voting (AV) to be held on the 5th May 2011. Despite both camps using the British National Party as a reason to vote one way or the other, our stance is the AV is a system that we do not want it, do not need it, and can ill afford it.
Alternative Voting is even more disproportional than the first-past-the-post system that is currently used, and as such is fundamentally unfair to smaller parties such as ourselves. AV is also costly. With ordinary families facing tough times and even tougher choices, can we really afford to spend an estimated quarter of a billion pounds of taxpayers' money bringing in a new voting system?
Alternative Voting does very little to give a voice to those who have been traditionally under-represented in parliament and as there is no transfer of powers from party authority to the voters, it does not produce a proportional parliament.
In other words, the Alternative Voting system is no improvement upon the existing First-Past-The-Post system and is merely designed to make it more difficult for a party such as the British National Party to gain parliamentary representation.
The Alternative Voting system is a sleight of hand which is directed against the British National Party, and as such, is also a sleight of hand directed at the hundreds of thousands of people who now say that they would vote for a party such as us.
Alternative Voting is not aimed at improving democracy in Britain. Rather, Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg’s sudden conversion to AV is an indication that they have now fully comprehended the meaning of the British National Party’s recent surge in vote totals — and are desperate to undermine democracy even further.
So on May the 5th, please vote NO to the Alternative Voting system, and encourage your friends and family to do the same.
Alternative Voting is even more disproportional than the first-past-the-post system that is currently used, and as such is fundamentally unfair to smaller parties such as ourselves. AV is also costly. With ordinary families facing tough times and even tougher choices, can we really afford to spend an estimated quarter of a billion pounds of taxpayers' money bringing in a new voting system?
Alternative Voting does very little to give a voice to those who have been traditionally under-represented in parliament and as there is no transfer of powers from party authority to the voters, it does not produce a proportional parliament.
In other words, the Alternative Voting system is no improvement upon the existing First-Past-The-Post system and is merely designed to make it more difficult for a party such as the British National Party to gain parliamentary representation.
The Alternative Voting system is a sleight of hand which is directed against the British National Party, and as such, is also a sleight of hand directed at the hundreds of thousands of people who now say that they would vote for a party such as us.
Alternative Voting is not aimed at improving democracy in Britain. Rather, Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg’s sudden conversion to AV is an indication that they have now fully comprehended the meaning of the British National Party’s recent surge in vote totals — and are desperate to undermine democracy even further.
So on May the 5th, please vote NO to the Alternative Voting system, and encourage your friends and family to do the same.
Saturday, 16 April 2011
Handbags at dawn
In this topsy turvy world that we live in its hardly surprising that groups and organisations have internal squabbles and difference of opinions once in a while. Its inevitable.
During these times it is often hard to see any sort of potential for a productive outcome. Usually though with hindsight many issues can be put to bed after a bit of time and reflection as you normally find that people have a united and common cause differences of opinions will be outweighed. Providing you are all singing of the same hymn sheet. Obviously the left is splitting on a deeper ideological level.
Adults can be stubborn, pig headed blood minded but on the right side of things the arguments eventually turn out to be a flash in a pan and unity will prevail. This is only because the common factor is a similar preferred future.
During these times any source of distraction is welcome, human nature allows us to take pleasure out of seeing your opponents facing similar troubles and strife. Even better is when you see a united opposition realise that they are ideologically split, possibly even going through a realisation process that one side is using the other for their own surreptitious agenda.
This particular article is nothing more than hilarious (click here)
You never know where you can find refreshing sources of amusement.
"hope" lol
During these times it is often hard to see any sort of potential for a productive outcome. Usually though with hindsight many issues can be put to bed after a bit of time and reflection as you normally find that people have a united and common cause differences of opinions will be outweighed. Providing you are all singing of the same hymn sheet. Obviously the left is splitting on a deeper ideological level.
Adults can be stubborn, pig headed blood minded but on the right side of things the arguments eventually turn out to be a flash in a pan and unity will prevail. This is only because the common factor is a similar preferred future.
During these times any source of distraction is welcome, human nature allows us to take pleasure out of seeing your opponents facing similar troubles and strife. Even better is when you see a united opposition realise that they are ideologically split, possibly even going through a realisation process that one side is using the other for their own surreptitious agenda.
This particular article is nothing more than hilarious (click here)
You never know where you can find refreshing sources of amusement.
"hope" lol
Friday, 15 April 2011
Papa luigi
This is taken from a comment on the BDF by "Papa Luigi". Makes an interesting read..........
Organised Minority Advantage – An Exposition
Paradise Island
Paradise Island is the home of a relatively small community of 10,000 people. The people of Paradise Island are famous for their production of high quality widgets that they sell as components to larger manufacturing client companies on the mainland.
The population of Paradise Island has been changing in recent years. The widget business has been depressed for some time and competition for contracts on the mainland has been fierce. A number of widget companies have imposed a wage freeze in order to keep wages down and their prices competitive. The wage freeze has cause a number of families from Paradise Island to emigrate to the mainland in search of more lucrative employment, thus creating housing vacancies and one of the widget companies, Acme Widgets has taken to employing cheaper immigrant labour.
The immigrants from Auslandia have taken up the vacant housing and now compose 5% of the population of Paradise Island. The Islanders are polite and friendly people and for the most part have welcomed the Auslanders into their community. The Auslanders are hard working people and they appreciate the opportunity to better themselves on Paradise Island. They do their best to live harmoniously and for a while at least, life on Paradise Island remains good.
Grocery Stores
The island is served by 10 grocery stores that are fairly evenly distributed across the island and each store attracts on average 1000 customers. The grocery store owners are conscious of the fact that times are difficult for the island's main industry and that many workers have not had a pay rise for several years and therefore they have tended to keep their profit margins low, to around 2.5% of turnover. On average each islander spends £1000 per year on groceries, and this means that each grocery store has a turnover of £1,000,000 per annum and as a consequence, each grocer makes a profit of just 2.5% of £1,000,000, which equates to £25,000 per annum. Not a princely sum, but enough for an honest man who cares about his community.
A day comes however when one of the grocers has grown too old and his health has begun to fail. He decides to retire and advertises his shop for sale. He places his shop for sale at auction with a reserve price of £200,000, and when the auction takes place there is vigorous bidding from the nine remaining island grocers who are all keen to expand their businesses. There is an upset at the auction however because the highest bed comes not from the existing island grocers but from a consortium of Auslanders who manage to outbid all of the grocers. The vacant grocery business is sold to the Auslander consortium for £250,000, more than any of the islanders could afford to pay.
The Auslanders were able to outbid the Paradise Islanders because they had pooled the savings of all of their people on the island and had also received money sent by relatives from back home in Auslandia. The Auslanders are not just a very hard working people, they are thrifty and they have a strong sense of community which motivates them to work together as a community and to help each other to get on and better themselves.
The strong group loyalty of the Auslanders means that they will in future all buy their groceries from the Auslandic Grocery Store. They will do this out of a strong desire to see their store become successful. This tendency on their part however begins to create an imbalance within the community on Paradise Island.
The Paradise Islanders had been raised to treat others fairly and not to discriminate, and this means that Paradise Islanders continue to distribute their custom fairly equally between the ten grocery stores on the island.
With 9,500 indigenous islanders, this means that each store enjoys the custom of 950 people on average and has a turnover from the indigenous community of just £950,000.
The Auslandic store however, also has the benefit of the turnover from the Auslandic community, which amounts to 500 x £1,000 = £500,000 per annum. The Auslandic store therefore has a turnover of £1,450,000 compared to the turnover of just £950,000 enjoyed by the other indigenous islander store keepers, and while the indigenous storekeepers incomes have reduced to just 2.5% of £950,000 = £23,750 each, the Auslandic store made a profit of 2.5% x £1,450,000 = £36,250.
It is the group loyalty of the Auslanders that made the Auslander Grocery Store instantly the most profitable grocery store on the island.
Pressing Home The Advantage
Things do not stop here however, the Auslander consortium being keen businessmen decide to capitalise on their commercial advantage and realising that due to hard economic times most Islanders are very cost conscious, the consortium decide to reduce their prices by reducing their profit margin from 2.5% to just 2.0%. While this means that their profits will not initially be quite as great as they might have been (just 2.0% of £1,000 x 1,450 = £29,000 per annum), their store will still be more profitable than any other island grocers and they will be able to undercut the other island grocers on price and thereby attract a greater share of the island’s custom.
Although the 0.5% drop in prices is relatively small and goes unnoticed initially, it does have the effect of winning the exclusive custom of another 500 of the island’s indigenous population.
This means that in future the ten island stores enjoy an equal share of the custom from just 9,000 people, producing a turnover each of just £900,000, while the Auslander store enjoys the custom of an additional 1,000 people, the 500 Auslanders and the 500 most price conscious indigenous Islanders, producing a turnover for the Auslandic store of 1,900 x £995 = £1,890,500. The Auslandic store now has a turnover that is more than twice that of any other store and even with the reduced profit margin is making profits of 2.01%* of £995 x 1,900 = £38,000 per annum compared to 2.5% of £1,000 x 900 = £22,500 for the indigenous Islander stores.
* Note: A 2.0% profit margin based upon original price levels equates to slightly over 2.01% of prices once they are reduced by 0.5%.
One day, one of the indigenous storekeepers having suffered a 10% reduction in his income finds that with the needs of his family to consider he just cannot remain in business. He decides to sell up and emigrate to the mainland in search of better opportunities and his business goes to auction.
Predictably, none of the indigenous island store holders is able to afford to buy the vacant store because with dropping turnover and squeezed profit margins, they are already struggling to stay in business. Facing unfair price competition from the Auslandic store, the indigenous storekeepers are suffering a much reduced income and are only just able to keep their heads above water as it is. The second store is purchased by the Auslandic consortium and they calculate that the increased turnover it provides will enabled them to reduce their prices even more and press home their competitive advantage to greater effect.
The increased turnover now means that the Auslandic store is able to successfully apply to the grocery wholesaler on the mainland for a 2.5% discount on the normal wholesale prices paid for produce, and following this, the Auslandic stores on paradise Island will be able to charge prices that significantly undercut the indigenous island stores.
Profit Margins Are Squeezed Again
The ten island grocery stores currently enjoy the custom of 900 indigenous islanders each, and operating now with the 2% profit margin forced upon them in their efforts to compete with the Auslandic stores, each indigenous island grocer now has turnover of just £895,500 and profits reduced from their original level of £25,000 per annum, to just £895,500 x 2.01% = £18,000 per annum.
The Auslandic stores however are going from strength to strength and with the 2.5% reduction in wholesale prices are now able to increase their competitive advantage by reducing their retail prices further.
Originally wholesale prices amounted to 50% of retail prices, i.e. 50p in every £1.00 spent by customers. With retail prices discounted by 2.5%, this means that the Auslandic store now only pays £48.75 for every £100.00 worth of produce sold at the original retail prices, increasing the potential profit margin from £2.50 per £100 worth of produce, to £3.75.
Prices have already been reduced from their original levels by 0.5% however, and so the while the indigenous island grocers are only making a margin of £2.00 per £100 of produce sold at the original retail prices, the Auslandic stores could potentially make £3.25. To increase their competitive position however the Auslandic stores reduce their prices by a further 0.75%, pitching their profit per £100.00 of produce sold at the original prices to £2.50, and thereby returning to the original norm of £2.50 per £100.00 of produce sold, i.e. a 2.5% profit margin.
To compete with this latest price reduction, the indigenous grocers face the prospect of reducing their prices to match the Auslandic stores, but without the benefit of discounted wholesale prices, the indigenous grocers are forced to reduce their profit margin from 2.0% based upon original price levels, to just 1.25%. Thus the profit they make per £100 of produce sold at original prices is reduced to just £1.25, precisely half what they were making originally and now a long way below sustainable levels. The indigenous island store holders are now slowly going broke.
With the custom of just 900 islanders each, spending £1,000 per annum on food at original prices, the indigenous grocers are now making just £11,250 per annum in profits, while the Auslandic stores with a total of [(2 x 900) + 500 + 500] = 2,800 customers are making 2.5% of £1,000 x 2,800 = £70,000 in profits, £35,000 per store.
A Commercial Empire Is Born
As the months and years pass, the Auslandic stores expand buying up more of the indigenous stores and the indigenous grocers go broke, until they own six out of the ten original stores. The Auslandic stores adopt a brand name based upon a combination of the first letters of the surname of the original Auslandic founder Mr Cobana and the first letters of his wife’s forename, Bess, and the chain of Auslandic stores become known as Besco Stores.
So dramatic had been the rise of the Besco empire that Mr Cobana is hailed as a genius of commerce and is invited to become the Chairman of the island’s Retailer’s Guild.
Some of the remaining indigenous grocers complain about unfair competition and point to the unfair advantage that Mr Cobana enjoyed due to the ethnocentricity of his compatriots, but they are admonished by the ‘great and the good’, who crave the friendship of the now wealthy and influential commercialist, and by the local newspapers who fear losing his vast advertising revenue.
Mr Cobana is not the only Auslandic businessman to rise to prominence on Paradise Island. Like him numerous other Auslanders have started a whole range of businesses and through the support of their compatriots have gained a competitive advantage over their unwary indigenous island competitors. Now almost all of the seats on the board of the Retailer’s Guild and most other trade bodies are taken by enterprising Auslanders and a myth emerges that they are simply very astute businessmen. They possess this, ‘je ne sais quoi’ that enables them to mysteriously rise to the top in whatever field of endeavour they choose.
What can it be though, this illusive quality that commentators find so difficult to pin point?
Academics and social commentators who study the rise of such people shy away from alluding to the ethnocentricity of the Auslanders, for fear of being labelled anti-Auslandic, the most abhorrent form of racism. Some fearless members of the community claim that the Auslanders have carried out a conspiracy to gain dominance on Paradise Island, but through a process of opprobrium and social exclusion, such people are dismissed as ‘conspiracy theorists’, and nut cases.
Organised Minority Advantage
As we can see from the story outlined above, it is easy for an organised minority to prosper disproportionately and gain undue influence within a weakly cohesive host community. They don’t need to be commercial geniuses, they don’t need to work harder than others, they simply need to give preference to their own group, and to do it covertly, so that no one objects until it is too late.
Some organised minorities within our society are religious based, while some are ethnically based, and many are simply commercial alliances, such as Masonic groups. The most powerful and successful such groups however, employ all three of these factors reinforcing the cohesion and co-operation of their ‘in-group’ and more clearly separating them from the host ‘out-group’ community.
By doing so, they can counter the opposition they encounter from individuals that might complain about their tactics and dismiss those complaints as evil racism and religious intolerance. Thus the complainants are cowed and thrown on the defensive.
Organised minority advantage is a phenomenon, which is often described by those who observe it from the outside as a ‘conspiracy’. It is not necessarily an explicit conspiracy however, in which the individuals concerned follow a predetermined and written set of protocols, but it is a conspiracy in that it involves individuals behaving just as if they were engaged in a conspiracy and produces results that are precisely those that one would expect if a conscious conspiracy were taking place. This is one of the reasons why multiculturalism and multiracialism always results in antagonism between different religious, racial and ethnic groups, because their innate ethnocentricity causes each ethnic group to behave in a way that grants them an advantage and places other ethnic groups at a disadvantage.
Charades
David Cameron looks set to acknowledge the fact that the BNP were right in their campaigns to halt mass immigration under the last labour government. The Sun newspaper reported today that he is likely to state that he wants to eliminate the BNP once and for all.
The main problem facing the old fashioned parties is that their inability to tackle immigration and its inherent problems is not one that that they will take, so the problem will not go away.
The last thing that they want is a party that highlights their continual mismanagement of our national identity
He obviously is under tough pressure from the conservative wing of the con-dem alliance and is in the awkward position of needing to appease all.
Does this mean that rather than the cons becoming more liberal the liberals are moving to the right? (unlikely to say the least)
Does this mean that the cap on mass immigration is more than just talk? I wouldn't hold your breath waiting!
Does this mean that the cap on mass immigration is more than just talk? I wouldn't hold your breath waiting!
This is the usual nonsense churned out by the Liblabcon alliance in a theatrical style performance that we have all come to recognise. The Liberals must be squirming with their "unholy alliance". It just shows you how they have sold out for a bit of power.
Nick Clegg had announced during the run up to the general election that immigrants were better off directed to areas that could assume them. By the looks of his con-dem Governments proposals that means their countries of origin! He must be a serious disappointment to the Lib-dems.
The impending theatrical debates on this topic are an obvious ploy, most people are becoming wise to the smokescreens that the old hat establishment parties employ. A massive discussion with no real outcome, bombardment by the mainstream media of hysterical headlines based on hollow promises, a saturation policy designed to completely turn people off listening to political debate and to what they are actually up to.
Cameron announced during the leadership debates that he had no problem with immigration but wanted to reduce the level from hundreds of thousands down to tens of thousands. We are committed to allowing in EU immigrants by way of our sell out to the EU. To reduce the amount of migrants from outside the EU would surely be classed as discriminatory, possibly even racist would it not? This will be challenged I would assume time after time in the courts. I can not see the type of migration policies being considered actually being implemented as they are opening a minefield of discrimination claims.
If immigration is still going to be allowed unchecked through EU countries then the UK will possibly become a source of a problem and for other EU countries. Making us even less popular than we are already.
There is already a growing problem in other countries with them being used as a holding point for non EU migrants on their way to Britain.
They might well experience a rise in immigrants on their way here. How will they distinguish their origin? How will they tell the difference say between a Somalian for example who has arrived in Holland for a short time to become eligible for entry into the UK as an EU citizen? Or a Somalian that has lived in Holland for a good few years and just wishes to relocate to the UK?
Would they be treated as different to a German that has moved to Holland and then wishes to move to the UK?How would the be defined?
Colour of skin? They cant do that can they? Length of time as an EU citizen? cant do that either as once you are an EU citizen you are eligible.
There is already a growing problem in other countries with them being used as a holding point for non EU migrants on their way to Britain.
They might well experience a rise in immigrants on their way here. How will they distinguish their origin? How will they tell the difference say between a Somalian for example who has arrived in Holland for a short time to become eligible for entry into the UK as an EU citizen? Or a Somalian that has lived in Holland for a good few years and just wishes to relocate to the UK?
Would they be treated as different to a German that has moved to Holland and then wishes to move to the UK?How would the be defined?
Colour of skin? They cant do that can they? Length of time as an EU citizen? cant do that either as once you are an EU citizen you are eligible.
If, as many people feel, you are opposed to immigration en-mass and as this government has admitted, its obviously finally been recognised as a problem, then the only fair way to deal with it is to stop it from all angles including the EU.
The only fair and non discriminatory way to deal with ending migration is to be non-discriminatory about it altogether and stop it across the board.
But that would mean that a further admittance by the establishment that the BNP were right again!
So I would not concern yourself that the Con-dem charade will alter much at all, for those that might feel that the government are going to prevent the inevitable multi-cultural enhancement of Britain.
It will just mean that they have to enjoy a holiday somewhere in the EU first!
I don't think that will prevent a rise in support for the BNP in the long run. DO you?
The main problem facing the old fashioned parties is that their inability to tackle immigration and its inherent problems is not one that that they will take, so the problem will not go away.
The last thing that they want is a party that highlights their continual mismanagement of our national identity
visit www.bnp.org.uk
mainly because they don't want you to.
mainly because they don't want you to.
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
BNP Mayor?
John Cave, the ex-Burnley Organiser and husband of British National Party District and County Councillor Sharon Wilkinson, has just been declared Deputy Mayor of Padiham in Lancashire. John took his seat on Padiham Town Council in 2010 when he was elected unopposed in last year’s elections.
He said that the decision meant that common sense had prevailed after a minority of councillors raised objections to his appointment, based on motives he claimed were party political.
However, the confusion and controversy over standing order rules were quashed as a majority of Padiham town councillors voted in favour of Cllr Cave at a meeting on Monday 4th April.
However local Bishop John Goddard said it was "a sad day" for Padiham.
Yet another so called community leader condemns the BNP!
Full story here and here.
He said that the decision meant that common sense had prevailed after a minority of councillors raised objections to his appointment, based on motives he claimed were party political.
However, the confusion and controversy over standing order rules were quashed as a majority of Padiham town councillors voted in favour of Cllr Cave at a meeting on Monday 4th April.
However local Bishop John Goddard said it was "a sad day" for Padiham.
Yet another so called community leader condemns the BNP!
Full story here and here.
CHINGFORD: Drug dealers jailed

A creeping problem which is no longer confined to the inner city.
TWO middle aged men who were caught with more than £700,000 worth of cannabis in their car have been jailed for three years each.
Patrick Kelly, 55, and Daniel Jones, 44, were stopped by police after residents reported them acting suspiciously in Sinclair Road, Chingford, at around 11.30pm on a Wednesday night in April last year.
Full story here.
Monday, 11 April 2011
Letter to the Guardian
Letter in answer to the local Epping Forest Guardian newspapers article which can be found here.
Dear Sir
The British National Party in the Epping Forest District is going through a major restructure.
This will allow us to give the constituents a better service in dealing with problems they have.
The Liberal Democrats are using this as an opportunity to desperately regain their status from the LRA as opposition in the council. As a national party it was very damaging to them to lose this in the first place, and also shows the complete lack of trust Residents have in the main parties.
The LRA have overstretched themselves, already with disunity in the association with regards to certain decisions and situations that have arisen.
This has in turn proved in itself the truth that the BNP has stood by, despite criticism.
Your piece quotes Eddy Butler who is not a British National Party member.
Cllr Murray thanks Searchlight and says that the BNP is finished.
If this is so, why is there a continual worry and obsession about the BNP?
Don’t be complacent we are still here, locally and nationally.
Cllr Rodney Law
Loughton Town Council
Clive Jefferson
National Election Officer
British National Party
Dear Sir
The British National Party in the Epping Forest District is going through a major restructure.
This will allow us to give the constituents a better service in dealing with problems they have.
The Liberal Democrats are using this as an opportunity to desperately regain their status from the LRA as opposition in the council. As a national party it was very damaging to them to lose this in the first place, and also shows the complete lack of trust Residents have in the main parties.
The LRA have overstretched themselves, already with disunity in the association with regards to certain decisions and situations that have arisen.
This has in turn proved in itself the truth that the BNP has stood by, despite criticism.
Your piece quotes Eddy Butler who is not a British National Party member.
Cllr Murray thanks Searchlight and says that the BNP is finished.
If this is so, why is there a continual worry and obsession about the BNP?
Don’t be complacent we are still here, locally and nationally.
Cllr Rodney Law
Loughton Town Council
Clive Jefferson
National Election Officer
British National Party
Cllr Frankland

Showing yet again the biasness and the need to edit certain pieces from our elected Councillors letters by the local rag, a good example is the following sent into the local Guardian from our hardworking Councillor Tony Frankland.
Unfortunately the paper decided that the connection of certain serving Cllrs to such extremist organisations, was to be left out, omitting the last sentence of the letter.
Why should we extradite Noor Ramjanally?
The cost to the hard pressed tax payer to keep him in 3 star accommodation with free television, gym and, as near as dammit, private medical and dental care, plus when released state benefits. We should send more foreign criminals back to where they came from and then spend the money we save on more deserving people. The old and young injured servicemen and women returning from the wars. I wonder if he will be sending his friends in Searchlight and the church the odd postcard whilst sunning himself in Mauritius.
Cllr Tony Frankland, Alderton Ward
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

